Legal Opinion

State v. Cochran

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 5, 2004No. 25799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

All Out Bonding Company (appellant) appeals three circuit court orders, which have been consolidated for this appeal, holding appellant liable for the estreatment of three separate bonds. We affirm the circuit court orders.

ISSUE

Did the circuit court err in finding appellant liable for bonds written for the defendants’ failure to appear in court?

ANALYSIS

Appellant is a licensed insurance agency which has been appointed by Frontier Insurance Company (Frontier) to act as its agent. Mike Curlee, the owner of appellant, is licensed by the Department of Insurance as a surety bondsman. Frontier acts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dibble v. DibbleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McClintonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API