Legal Opinion

Pinther v. Hiett

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1994No. 93-276PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Advancing several theories, appellant challenges the district court’s entry of a judgment by consent.

We affirm.

I.ISSUES

Appellant frames the following issues:

I. Did the district court have the authority, or in the alternative, did the district court abuse its discretion, when it granted a permanent injunction restraining appellant from:

A. Displaying certain described behaviors in the presence of appellant’s stepchildren;

B. Possessing firearms in the presence of appellant’s step-children.

II. Did Petitioner lack standing to bring a petition which sought to protect the interest of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,957 in Re U.S. Oil and Gas Litigation. Gerald B. Wald, Receiver of U.S. Oil and Gas Corporation, Eagle Oil and Gas Corporation, the Stratford Company v. Gurdon Wolfson, Pinnacle Reinsurance Company, Ltd., a Bermuda Corporation, Defendant-Cross Claim Alexander & Alexander, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, Jerrell Riley, Defendants-Cross Claim Edward B. And Tina M. Learned, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Who Purchased Oil and Gas Programs Coupled With an Annuity From U.S. Oil and Gas Corporation and the Stratford Company v. Gurdon WolfsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Christensen v. OedekovenWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API