Legal Opinion

Imhoff v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1963No. Appeals, Nos. 156 and 157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Margaret Mary Imhoff and her husband, Paul Imhoff, filed a complaint in trespass against the City of Pittsburgh to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife-plaintiff on the afternoon of January 3, 1957, when she slipped and fell while walking along Pliney Way. The case was tried before Honorable Ruggero J. Aldisert and a jury. The defendant called no witnesses, but presented a point for binding instructions, which point was refused. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the wife-plaintiff in amount of $1,200.00, and a verdict in favor of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Solinsky v. Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Strauch v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Strauch v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huber v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Vitelli v. City of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ily v. North Versailles TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Antonucci v. Sun Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Camaro v. Upper Darby Township, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API