Smith v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Haul, Judge.
Under Federal law, it is unlawful for a common carrier to engage in any interstate operation on a public highway “unless there is in force with respect to such carrier a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Commission authorizing such operations. . .” 49 U.S.C.A. § 306. The certificate specifies the routes over which the common earner is authorized to operate and no carrier may deviate from the specified route except “under such general or special rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe.” 49 U.S.C.A. § 308. “Any person knowingly and willfully…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Ladson Motor Company v. CroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Standard Accident Insurance v. KikerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Wesley Ex Rel. Wesley v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- General Accident Fire & Life Insurance v. SturgisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. TriggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Odom v. Transamerica Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Williams v. GartrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Adams v. U. S.. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.