Legal Opinion

Occinto v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1931No. 9204, 9205PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

These are appeals from convictions for violations of the Internal Revenue Act (Rev. St. §§ 3266, 3281, 3282 [26 USCA §§ 291, 306, 307]) relating to distilled spirits. The indictment was against both of the defendants and in five counts. The first count charged the making of mash, fit for production of alcoholic spirits, in a barn in Douglas County, Neb., not being a duly authorized distillery; the second count covered the fermentation of the mash; the third count covered the separation of alcoholic spirits from fermented mash in the same place, the defendants not being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steele v. United States No. 2Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Wida v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Vecchio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  3. Cravens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. DanielsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
  5. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API