Alexander v. Bozeman Motors, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Rice
¶39 I concur with the Court’s conclusion that summary judgment was properly entered against Ostermiller, as well as its conclusion that § 39-71-413, MCA, is constitutional. However, I dissent from the Court’s conclusion that Alexander has asserted facts necessary to evade the rule of exclusivity.
¶40 The Legislature has declared that “an objective of the Montana workers’ compensation system [is to] provide, without regard to fault, wage supplement and medical benefits to a worker suffering from a work-related injury or disease.” Section 39-71-105(1), MCA. Pursuant thereto, the Legislature has…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Angle v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Grillo v. National Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Jolane Russell v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Blailock v. O'BANNONMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Noonan v. Spring Creek Forest Products, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.