Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Matter of Estates of Wahl

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 6, 1982No. 4349-5-IIIPublished

1Concurrence

Roe, A.C.J.

(concurring)—I concur in the majority opinion that summary judgment was inappropriate. If Rose Wahl's testamentary heirs had moved for summary judgment in their favor, it should have been granted because all of the facts are present before the court.

Lay people are encouraged to look to lawyers for advice regarding disposition of their property upon death. Neal and Rose Wahl were of one mind respecting this matter. They executed wills in 1962 and 1963 respectively providing for a 90-day survival period before the survivor would receive the deceased spouse's estate. This is to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Estate of GeerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API