Houghton v. Ross
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
In this ease Houghton sued Boss for the use of two teams which Boss bought of Gordon & Co., but which plaintiff claimed as his own. One was a team of black ponies which plaintiff insisted were given him for a pair of gray mares disposed of in Canada for a much less sum than the ponies were worth. The other team he claimed to have bought from a vessel. As it was intimated on the hearing that this second team had been put out of the case by a reduction of the verdict, we need not look beyond so much ■of the record as refers to the others.
In this, as in the replevin case, plaintiff’s testimony…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Tanner v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. TrineMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Eisenberg v. C. F. Battenfeld Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. HuttonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.