Legal Opinion
Lauderdale v. Lauderdale
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 30, 1957No. 57-1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
96 So.2d 663 (1957)
John Thomas LAUDERDALE, Appellant,
v.
Myrtle LAUDERDALE, Appellee.
No. 57-1.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 30, 1957.
Rehearings Denied August 13, and September 3, 1957.
Arden E. Jensen and Jack Moore, Miami, for appellant.
Charles J. Bodner, Miami, for appellee.
CARROLL, CHAS., Chief Judge.
The appellant John Thomas Lauderdale was the defendant in his wife's suit under Section 65.09, F.S.A., for alimony unconnected with divorce. She charged him with extreme cruelty, and sought alimony, suit money and an accounting and division of property.
The husband did…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bailey v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Strauss v. StraussSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Pross v. ProssSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Kollar v. KollarSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Astor v. AstorSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Dworkis v. DworkisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Klein v. KleinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Lyons v. LyonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Rogoff v. RogoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Tingle v. HornsbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.