Legal Opinion

Bie, Et Ux. v. Hulet

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 2, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BUFORD, J.:

This is the second appearance of this case here. See Hulet v. Denison, et al., 146 Fla. 478, 1 Sou. (2nd) 467.

On the going down of the mandate, appellants, with consent of the court, filed counterclaim for the aggregate amount which they alleged they had paid in taxes on the property and prayed that the payment of taxes be adjudicated a lien in favor of claimants superior in dignity to the lien of the mortgage sought to be foreclosed.

On motion, the counterclaim was dismissed.

Claimants now seek review by certiorari under our Rule 34 of the order dismissing counter claim.

Under our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. RelfSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  2. Clermont-Minneola Country Club, Inc. v. CouplandSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Hulet v. DenisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Smith v. FeltnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hilsenroth v. KesslerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API