Eagle Rental, Inc. v. State Tax Assessor
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.
[¶ 1] Eagle Rental appeals from a judgment entered in the Business and Consumer Docket (Nivison, J.) declaring that the company owes use tax on four Cadillac Escalades. Eagle Rental argues that it does not owe use tax because Daniel Bickford, the company’s sole shareholder, and his wife operated the Escalades with dealer plates for their personal use in accordance with Maine’s dealer plate statute, 29-A M.R.S. § 1002(1)(B) (2012). Specifically, the company contends that the dealer plate statute, which permits “personal use” of vehicles in a company’s inventory bearing dealer plates, see id.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frank v. Assessors of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Town of Poland v. Poland Spring Health Institute, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Eagle Rental, Inc. v. City of WatervilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Irving Pulp & Paper, Ltd. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nicole Dussault v. RRE Coach Lantern Holdings, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Phyllis Bradbury v. City of EastportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Eric v. Warnquist v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- Somerset Telephone Company v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- Kennebec County v. Maine Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.