Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurrence · MadsenMadsen, J.
(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — Because the majority would unjustifiably expand the notion of "fairness” far beyond any cross examination right previously accorded in a public hearing of this nature, I respectfully dissent with respect to this portion of its opinion. Contrary to time-honored rules of statutory construction, the majority tortures the Pierce County Hearing Examiner Code (the Code), Pierce County Code (PCC) ch. 2.36, to reach its dubious result. Then, claiming that a due process analysis is unnecessary to support its reading of the Code, the majority goes beyond the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Durham.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.