Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1994No. 60222-1Published

1Concurrence · MadsenMadsen, J.

(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — Because the majority would unjustifiably expand the notion of "fairness” far beyond any cross examination right previously accorded in a public hearing of this nature, I respectfully dissent with respect to this portion of its opinion. Contrary to time-honored rules of statutory construction, the majority tortures the Pierce County Hearing Examiner Code (the Code), Pierce County Code (PCC) ch. 2.36, to reach its dubious result. Then, claiming that a due process analysis is unnecessary to support its reading of the Code, the majority goes beyond the…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Durham.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API