Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Wilson
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1890No. 14,344PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint of the appellees seeks a decree quieting title to real estate, and the single objection urged by the appellants against it, is that it does not sufficiently show that a claim of title is asserted by them. This contention can not prevail. There is a general allegation that the defendants assert an unfounded title, and this allegation is sufficient. Otis v. De Boer, 116 Ind. 531; Johnson v. Taylor, 106 Ind. 89; Rausch v. Trustees, etc., 107 Ind. 1; Conger v. Miller, 104 Ind. 592; Woodworth v. Zimmerman, 92 Ind. 349; Marot v. Germania, etc., Ass’n, 54 Ind. 37.
We have no doubt that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bishop v. MoormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Otis v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Conger v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Rausch v. Trustees of the United Brethren in Christ ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Johnson v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seymour Water Co. v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Chaplin v. LeapleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- City of Lafayette v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Bollenbacher v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. MaigeSupreme Court of Florida · 1933