Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 9, 1928No. Docket No. 21116Published

Two banks were affiliated for the period January 1, 1922, to March 14, 1922, and on the latter date they merged under the National Bank Act and continued as one bank throughout the remainder of the year. Held that but one return was required.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAND RAPIDS NATIONAL BANK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Grand Rapids Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

Docket No. 21116.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

9 B.T.A. 1119; 1928 BTA LEXIS 4297;

January 9, 1928, Promulgated

Two banks were affiliated for the period January 1, 1922, to March 14, 1922, and on the latter date they merged under the National Bank Act and continued as one bank throughout the remainder of the year. Held that but one return was required.

Frank E. Seidman, C.P.A., for the petitioner.

Alva C. Baird, Esq., for the respondent.

SIEFKIN

This is a proceeding for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grand Rapids Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API