In the Interest of Doe
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
NAKAMURA, J.
Juvenile-Appellant John Doe appeals from a decree of the Family Court of the First Circuit adjudging him to be a law violator within the purview of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-11(1) (1985). 1 The decree, he urges, should be vacated because the family court erred in the course of the hearing on the petition alleging he came within the purview of HRS § 571-11(1) because he committed an act which would have been a crime under HRS § 707 — 736(I)(b) (1985), 2 Sexual Abuse in the First Degree, if committed by an adult. Concluding from a review of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MaelegaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MooreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BatanganHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FeteleeHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.