Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Doe

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1988No. 12357PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

Juvenile-Appellant John Doe appeals from a decree of the Family Court of the First Circuit adjudging him to be a law violator within the purview of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 571-11(1) (1985). 1 The decree, he urges, should be vacated because the family court erred in the course of the hearing on the petition alleging he came within the purview of HRS § 571-11(1) because he committed an act which would have been a crime under HRS § 707 — 736(I)(b) (1985), 2 Sexual Abuse in the First Degree, if committed by an adult. Concluding from a review of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MaelegaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. MooreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. BatanganHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. FeteleeHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API