Slick v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtEvan A. Evans, Circuit Judge
(after stating the faets as above). In view of the statute (section 1024, E. S. [Comp. St. § 1690]), and the numerous decisions construing it (Williams v. United States, 168 U. S. 390, 18 S. Ct. 92, 42 L. Ed. 509; Pointer v. United States, 151 U. S. 400, 14 S. Ct. 410, 38 L. Ed. 208; Bartlett v. Lockwood, 160 U. S. 357, 16 S. Ct. 334, 40 L. Ed. 455; McElroy v. United States, 164 U. S. 77, 17 S. Ct. 31, 41 L. Ed. 355), we reject as without merit the contention that the court erred in consolidating the two indictments. It would have been an abuse of discretion not to consolidate them.
Because…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Kepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Graff v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- United States v. StoehrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Brunner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. HarvickDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1957
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.