Legal Opinion
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 26, 1996No. Nos. 350, 514, Dockets 95-7486, 95-7488PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge:
This action arises from the refusal of the City of New York and the New York City Department of Corrections (collectively “the City”) to pay long-distance charges assessed by American Telephone and Telegraph Company (“AT & T”) for telephone calls made from the City’s prison facility on Rikers Island, and the refusal on the part of New York Telephone Company (“NYT”) to indemnify the City. The City and NYT appeal from summary judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kevin T. Duffy, District Judge) for AT & T against the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Federal Communications Commission v. WNCN Listeners GuildSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ivy Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and New York Telephone Company, Defendants-Appellees-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 2006 Frank Calandra, Jr. Irrevocable Trust v. Signature Bank Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. The City of New York and the New York City Corrections Department, Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs- Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. New York Telephone Company, Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996