Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Haas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 18, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from tlie Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The defendant took six exceptions — five to. rulings in respect of evidence, which are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the Court; and the sixth to instructions granted or refused.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tlie Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The defendant took six exceptions — five to. rulings in respect of evidence, which are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the Court; and the sixth to instructions granted or refused. Sixth Exception. — The plaintiff offered the two following prayers: 1. If the jury believe that the account referred to in the letter of J. M. Simmons & Company, dated October, 3rd, 1868, was the account of John Haas & Company, charging $1432.37 for the coal, which had been shipped in September, 1868, then said…

1Opinion of the Court

Bowie, J.,

prepared the following opinion in his lifetime, and the same being concurred in after his decease by the Judges who participated in the hearing, it was filed as the opinion of the'Court: •

The suit, which is the subject of the present appeal, was instituted hy the appellee and his co-partner, William Eagely, trading under the name of John Haas & Co., against the appellant, Joseph M. Simmons, and his co-partners, Robert Gr. Rieman and Alfred Poor, trading under the name and firm of J. M. Simmons & Co., in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, on the 27th of June, 1870. The declaration…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abbott v. GatchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  2. Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  3. Warfield v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  4. Rice v. ForsythCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  5. Brooke v. QuynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eisenberg, Admin. v. Air Cond., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Molesworth v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Balderston v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. District Agency Co. v. Suburban Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  5. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc. v. Burns Bottling MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API