Legal Opinion

Fallen v. Rauguth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1929No. Gen. No. 33,284PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action for a real estate broker’s fee, brought by plaintiff against defendant for having at his instance procured one Joseph A. Holpuch to agree to purchase the real and personal property of Arlington Cemetery Association,

There was a trial before court and jury with a resulting verdict and judgment of $5,000, from which judgment defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The evidence indisputably shows that defendant did employ plaintiff to sell the Cemetery Association property for a half million dollars, and that he did agree…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McChesney v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  2. Scanlon v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Beidler v. RichardsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  4. Dickinson v. McKayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  5. Goodmanson v. RosensteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John F. Fleming, Incorporated v. Clarence A. Beutel and American National Bank and Trust Co. Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  2. Pippert v. SchieleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API