Legal Opinion

Ehrsam v. Lee

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 28, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

Frederick F. Ehrsam, of Bridgeport, under his will, left in trust the residue of his estate to William L. Zepp, one of the appellants, for the benefit of his two minor sons, George W., the other appellant, and Frederick F. Ehrsam, an appellee herein. The testamentary guardian of these minors appointed under the will died, and on October 29th, 1918, the appellee Florence Neary, now Florence Neary Lee, was appointed in her stead and duly qualified. The trustee under the will of Frederick F. Ehrsam has from time to time turned over to the guardian certain funds from the income of the trust…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Crow v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  3. Hescht v. CalvertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In re MellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. English v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langs v. HarderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. In Re Horn's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Tierney v. TierneyConnecticut Superior Court · 1943
  4. Anderson v. LinckMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Langs v. HarderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API