Legal Opinion

Crenshaw Bros. & Saffold v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1919No. Civ. No. 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. D. M. Young, Judge. Modified and affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was brought to recover damages for breach of contract in relation to the shipment of three separate and distinct consignments of grapes from three different points in California to Tampa, Florida. Briefly stated, the damage claimed was due to imperfect refrigeration, rough handling of the fruit, and unnecessary delay in transportation. The court found in favor of plaintiffs, and the appeal is taken from the judgment on a bill of exceptions. Only one question is open for consideration in this court, and that is, "What is .the measure or standard by which the amount of compensation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. EstillSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Boston & Maine Railroad v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Francosteel Corp. v. N. v. Nederlandsch AmerikaanscheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. McMullin v. Lyon Fireproof Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. American Locomotive Co. v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API