Legal Opinion · Dissent

Girard Clarification Petition

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1966No. Appeals, 167, 168, 175 to 180, 202, and 203; Appeals, 109 to 121Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell :

I very strongly disagree with the majority, the concurring and the dissenting Opinions. With respect to the concurring Opinion, the law is contrary thereto: Lawler v. Commonwealth, 347 Pa. 568, 33 A. 2d 432; Crawford’s Estate, 313 Pa. 127, 169 A. 438. The dissenting Opinion by Mr. Justice Musmanno merely restates the views and contentions which, as the sole dissenting Judge in the two prior decisions of this Court, he had previously expressed in those decisions. The majority Opinion states that it would be highly inappropriate for this Court to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Girard College TrusteeshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Girard Will CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API