Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Gault

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 3, 1938No. 13065PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

Under the Conformity Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 724, plaintiff filed an action at law-to recover from defendant, receiver of a national bank, the amount of a stockholder’s assessment paid by plaintiff upon assessment of the Comptroller of the Currency after the insolvency of the bank in the sum of $3,000 and $192.28 which he paid as accrued interest on the assessment and for interest at the rate of 6 per cent perannum on the installments thereof as paid.

An answer has been filed which admits the payments of principal and interest and the dates of the respective…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. White v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Investment & Securities Co. v. RobbinsDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API