Legal Opinion

Lafferty v. Lorimer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The. facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendants made the following agreement with plaintiff:

“We agree to pay G. Lafferty twenty cents per ton in coal for all orders taken and delivered at our office, said coal to be delivered as ordered.
“Robert Lorimer & Co.”

The date of this agreement is not given. We presume it was made about September 1, 1889, when defendants gave plaintiff a writing authorizing him to take orders for coal.

Plaintiff brought orders to the defendants for 1,744|-tons. Of this amount only 739 tons were delivered. Plaintiff-brings, suit-to recover $348.85, being the commission on all the orders taken by plaintiff.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daly v. Chapman Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Murray v. Hamilton Beach Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Gibler v. HickokMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API