Legal Opinion

Zawilski v. Prahl Construction Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying motion to require respondents to submit to arbitration reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Service of the amended answer by appellant superseded the original answer, and failure to allege in the original answer a demand to arbitrate was corrected by including such allegation in the amended answer. While improperly pleaded, such allegation “ is no less an assertion that the defendant does not intend to abandon his rights, and so rebuts any inference that would otherwise be drawn from the mere…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nagy v. Arcas Brass & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kane v. Ten Eyck Co.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kalin Contracting Co. v. Picram Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API