Legal Opinion

Asklar v. Gilb

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2012No. 02A03-1204-CT-170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAJODIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Derek and Pauline Asklar (“the Ask-lars”) appeal the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“Empire”). The Asklars contend that the trial court erred in holding that as a matter of law, Georgia law governs this dispute and that Empire’s uninsured/underin-sured motorist coverage limit was only $75,000. Finding that Indiana law should apply in this case, but that Empire’s uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage limit is still only $75,000, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. BeattyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Stonington Insurance Co. v. WilliamIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Asklar v. GilbIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Derek Asklar and Pauline Asklar v. David Gilb, Paul Garrett Smith d/b/a P.H. One Trucking, Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. d/b/a Zurich Northland Insurance Co., Travelers Indemnity Co. of AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API