Legal Opinion
Stell v. Briggs
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1953No. 8078PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McINNIS, Judge.
Plaintiff’s 1950 Buick automobile was damaged in an accident, the facts of which are set forth in our opinion in Crossley v. Stell, 69 So.2d 78. Only the front part of the automobile was damaged in the accident, including damage to the radiator, causing the water to leak out.
Immediately following the accident and before either automobile had been moved, plaintiff was carried to a hospital in Bas-trop. State Trooper, W. E. Brodnax called a wrecker from Bastrop 25 miles away to move the damaged automobiles to clear the highway. The Chevrolet automobile was first moved from the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ross v. TynesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Anderson v. London Guarantee Accident Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Kaiser v. PocheLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Miller v. Hammond MotorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Gulf & Ship Island R. R. v. Sutter Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goltzman v. RougeotDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1954
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Woolman & AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963