Legal Opinion
United States v. Deitz (In Re Deitz)
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 10, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-M-1800, Bankruptcy No. 89-B-1885-EPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MATSCH, District Judge.
The government appeals from an order, 106 B.R. 236, confirming a Chapter 13 Plan over the objection that the plan did not provide for payment of a proof of claim filed by the Internal Revenue Service as a priority claim. The bankruptcy judge apparently concluded that the claim was not entitled to priority because it claimed taxes which were not assessed within 240 days of the filing of the Chapter 13 petition.
The record on appeal does not contain a transcript or a written opinion of the bankruptcy judge’s reasoning. The debt- or/appellee did…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bartmann v. Maverick Tube Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Brickley v. United States (In Re Brickley)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In Re QuinlanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
- In Re DeitzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re William E. Richards, Debtor, United States of America v. William E. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Henry E. Montoya, M.D. And Juanita F. Montoya, Debtors. Henry E. Montoya, M.D. And Juanita F. Montoya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Gore v. United States (In Re Gore)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- Teeslink v. United States, Department of the Treasury (In Re Teeslink)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994
- West v. United States (In re West)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.