Legal Opinion

People v. Hemphill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1992No. Docket 92368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This defendant was resentenced by a judge who used a presentence report that had been prepared for his original sentencing, more than seven months earlier. The resentencing oc curred after the defendant waived his right to an updated presentence report. The Court of Appeals then ordered that the defendant again be resentenced, holding that a defendant may not waive the updating of the report. We conclude that the Court of Appeals erred, and so we reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

I

In October 1986, the defendant broke and entered an occupied dwelling. He was charged with that offense 1…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. TriplettMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. McKeeverMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. HartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Jeremiah Allen DeweyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. People of Michigan v. Keyshon Degon DotsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. People of Michigan v. Michael Clifford ByersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People of Michigan v. Steven Aderrick OdomMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API