Legal Opinion

Amsouth Bank, N.A. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 9, 1990No. 88-1397PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises out of a suit seeking reimbursement for payment made on a letter of credit. A jury determined that the plaintiff (issuer) was not entitled to reimbursement, and assessed damages against it for losses the defendants (account customers) allegedly suffered as a result of the issuer's payment to the beneficiary under the terms of the letter of credit. The issuer's motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial was denied, and this appeal followed. We reverse and remand with instructions.

On May 23, 1984, Joseph and Sally McCarron leased property known as the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alpine Bay Resorts, Inc. v. WyattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Farmers & Ginners Cotton Oil v. Reliance Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Bank of the Southeast v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holiday Isle, LLC v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Lemond Const. Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Southern Energy Homes, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Holloway v. Alabama Power Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Nobel Ins. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of BrundidgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API