Lunday v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSimpson, J.
(dissenting) — As I view it, the conclusion that the department has jurisdiction over this claim is untenable.
In order to present my position, I deem it necessary to state the following additional facts: There were two pieces of mechanical equipment situated in and used within the meat market operated by power-driven machinery, to-wit, a refrigerator and a meat grinder. Appellant’s husband testified that inside of the store he had nothing to do with the meat market, but was subject to call to assist the driver of the truck in delivering groceries from the Benjamin Franklin Thrift Stores,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edwards v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Carsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Dalmasso v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Jannak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Johnson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.