Legal Opinion · Dissent

Melvin v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 23, 1927No. 12227Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : The Court, in the case of Stewart v. Tel. Co., 93 S. C., 119; 76 S. E., 111, adverted-to the position taken by counsel for the telegraph company that the mental anguish statute was unconstitutional, in that “it denies to telegraph companies alone the benefit of the general rule, of which all other litigants are allowed the advantage, that a plaintiff cannot recover special damages, without alleging and proving that the defendant had notice, at the .time of making the contract,' of the circumstances out of which such damages might arise, in the event of its breach”; and in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  2. Cameron v. Western Union Tel. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  3. Bush v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. Galloway v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  5. Graham v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API