Legal Opinion

Delafield v. Parish

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 15, 1857PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShankland, J.

(delivering the' opinion of the Court of Appeals), says: “ Regarding as I do the cases of Stewart v. Lispenard, and Blanchard v. Nestle, as fixing the standard of testable capacity at any given point above that of the idiot and lunatic, the will cannot be declared void for the want of a sound disposing mind.” (Clarke v. Sawyer, 2 N. Y. [2 Comst.], 498.)

See the observations of Senator Verplanck on the speculative question, whether' the right of disposing of property after death flows from positive law and the policy of society, or is a part of the natural right of property, agreeing with Lord…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Comstock v. Hadlyme Ecclesiastical SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  2. In re the case of YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Clark v. FisherNew York Court of Chancery · 1828
  4. Betts v. Jackson ex dem. BrownCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  5. Stewart's v. LispenardNew York Supreme Court · 1841

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RhodesTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of ParkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
  3. In re proving the last Will & Testament of ShawNew York Surrogate's Court · 1874
  4. Black v. Delaware & Raritan Canal Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1871
  5. Ean v. SnyderNew York Supreme Court · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API