Moore v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Hicks, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The action is for the recovery of the sum .of $151, paid by the plaintiffs to the city of Minneapolis to procure a license to conduct an employment agency within the city for the procuring of employment for male persons. The ground upon -which repayment is sought is that the city ordinance requiring *419licenses from the city for such purpose was invalid, for reasons to be hereafter considered, and that the plaintiffs paid the fee for such license under threats of arrest and prosecution if a license were not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKenna v. . EdmundstoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- City of Mankato v. FowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Wood v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Supervisors of Walworth County v. Village of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
- City of Janesville v. MarkoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Huntworth v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. BrazeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- State ex rel. Seng v. PeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Moore v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.