Kaplan v. Roth
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
TERRELL, Justice.
Appellee instituted this action against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries received in an automobile accident. It is charged that the accident was caused by the negligence of George Mendel, an employee and agent of defendant. The answer denied negligence on the part of defendant or his agent and alleged that the sole proximate cause of the accident and injury was the negligence of the plaintiff. At the trial a verdict and judgment for $7,-‘845-was secured. This appeal is from that judgment.
In the course of an investigation of the accident by police officers,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stevens v. DukeSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- Herbert v. GarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Moseley v. EwingSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Myrick v. LloydSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nash Miami Motors, Inc. v. EllsworthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Ellsworth v. Nash Miami Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Hall v. HaldaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972