Legal Opinion

Sanitary Laundry Co. v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 24, 1919PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Common Law and Equity Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

The question involved in this case is purely a legal one, and is whether an infant under the age of sixteen years may be estopped to insist that she was employed contrary to the provisions of the child labor law forbidding the employment of infants under sixteen years of age in certain employments. The particular law Involved is subsection 9 of section 331a of the Kentucky Statutes.

The facts are that appellant (who was defendant be ■ •low) is a corporation operating a laundry in the city of Covington, Kentucky. Some time in June, 1916, defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marino v. . LehmaierNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. American Car & Foundry Co. v. ArmentrautIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. YedinakIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dusha v. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Armstrong's Administrator v. Sumne & Ratterman Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Louisville Woolen Mills v. KindgenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Clark v. Wells-Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API