Legal Opinion

Madeline NORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARTMARX SPECIALTY STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1990No. 90-1038PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge.

Hartmarx Specialty Stores, Inc. appeals a judgment awarding Madeline Norris actual damages and attorneys’ fees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982). Norris now seeks an award for the additional attorneys’ fees incurred on appeal. We affirm the district court’s award of actual damages. We remand the case to the district court, however, to give reasons for its award of attorneys’ fees.

Three black women, Madeline Norris, Patricia Woods, and Gayla Jackson, had been managers in the Dallas branch of Hart-marx, a chain of specialty…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. LHC Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  2. Daigle v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  3. Emma S. Vaughn v. Robert Edel, Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. DeCorte v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. In the Matter of August Perez, Iii, Debtor. Hibernia National Bank v. August Perez, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API