Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lagamba

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 1992No. 2933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This matter is on appeal by the Commonwealth from an order granting a motion to suppress. 1 We reverse.

As stated in Commonwealth v. Hamlin, 503 Pa. 210, 469 A.2d 137, 138-139 (1983):

The well established judicial principle is that in reviewing a suppression court’s ruling the appellate court is bound by factual findings supported by the record. [A]nd, [it] may not substitute [its] own findings for those of the suppression court. This principle of deference to trial courts has one important caveat however, appellate courts are not bound by findings wholly lacking in evidence.

[W]h…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Thomas Broadcasting Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. CamachoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. McElroySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. PizarroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Assanah-Carroll v. Law Offices of MaherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API