Legal Opinion

Waller v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 2, 2008No. 1024073PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELSEY, Judge.

The trial court convicted James Lester Waller for possessing a firearm after having been convicted of a violent felony. See Code § 18.2-308.2(A). On appeal, Waller claims the trial court erred (i) in not acquitting him based upon his necessity defense, and (ii) in admitting prior conviction orders and finding them sufficient to establish Waller’s status as a violent felon. Persuaded by neither assertion, we affirm.

I

On appeal, we review the evidence in the “light most favorable” to the Commonwealth. Commonwealth v. Hudson, 265 Va. 505, 514, 578 S.E.2d 781, 786 (2003). Viewing the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waller v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. Gregory Bryce Tanner v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  3. Navistar, Inc. v. New Baltimore Garage, Inc.Fauquier County Circuit Court · 2010
  4. Shaquawn Demonte Warren v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API