Legal Opinion

City of Welch v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1927No. 5968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

The Norfolk & Western Railway Company complains of the ruling of the circuit court of McDowell county in a certain condemnation proceeding, instituted by the City of Welch, wherein the city obtained an easement for street purposes across the carrier’s tracks and right-of-way.

In order to provide the residents of Woodmont Addition with a safe, convenient and adequate means of access to and from the schools, churches and business section of the city, the officials of the City of Welch decided to construct a concrete bridge over Elkhom River at a point directly opposite the foot of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  3. City of Bridgeport v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kingmill Valley Public Service District v. Riverview Estates Mobile Home Park, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Buda v. Town of MasontownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. West Virginia Board of Regents v. Fairmont Morgantown Pittsburgh RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API