Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided December 11, 1991No. 10-91-008-CRPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CUMMINGS, Justice.

Stephen Warren Dawkins appeals his conviction of felony driving while intoxicated. He was found guilty by a jury and assessed punishment at twenty years in prison and a $5,000 fine. Dawkins complains of the admission of a videotape showing his refusal to submit to sobriety tests. He also complains of testimony and argument regarding six prior arrests for driving while intoxicated and of jury misconduct involving a discussion of the parole law. We will affirm the judgment.

On March 23,1990, Dawkins was stopped by John Comer, a Hillsboro police officer, for a traffic…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Higgins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1996
  3. Cuellar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Branch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1995
  5. City of Seattle v. StalsbrotenWashington Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API