Legal Opinion

Gipson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 22, 1996No. 94-04601PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

Tracey Gipson challenges his judgment and sentence for possession of cocaine. We find no error as to Gipson’s conviction and therefore affirm. However, as Gipson argues, the trial court erred in imposing certain costs and probation conditions.

Gipson was ordered to pay $255 in court costs and $100 in investigative costs. Both costs were assessed without reference to their statutory authority. Therefore, we strike those costs. The state may seek to reimpose the costs upon remand. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

A defendant must be informed of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Bourque v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Drinnon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Godley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API