Legal Opinion

In re Dominique R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in revoking the original order of disposition which placed the appellant on probation. The presentment agency adduced “competent proof that the [appellant] without just cause failed to comply with [the] terms and conditions” of her probation (Family Ct Act § 779).

The appellant’s contention with respect to her placement is academic inasmuch as the placement has expired pursuant to its terms (see Matter of Joseph R., 49 AD3d 651 [2008]; Matter of Jeffrey McG., 8 AD3d 571 [2004]; Matter of Angelina S., 304 AD2d 833, 833-834 [2003]).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Joseph R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re Angelina S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Javan P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re Catherine B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re Catherine B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. In re Haralambos I.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re Jessica L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API