Legal Opinion

United States v. Maxine Forrest

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1981No. 79-5335PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction of perjury. 18 U.S.C. § 1621. Appellant Maxine Forrest, along with her husband, William Henry Forrest, was first convicted in federal district court of knowingly buying, receiving and possessing a tractor-trailer rig and its contents, a load of eggs. On appeal, this court reversed Maxine Forrest’s conviction because the evidence was not sufficient to establish that she knew the goods were stolen. See United States v. Forrest, 620 F.2d 446, 449-51 (5th Cir. 1980). Prior to this court’s ruling,' the government instituted the present case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weiler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. William Henry Forrest and Maxine ForrestCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Eldred J. Paternostro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Harold FREEDMAN, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SanchezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. ColemanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. United States v. TunstallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. CrottyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. United States v. DanielsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API