Legal Opinion

Browning v. Eichelman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1968No. Docket 3,185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCanham, J.

This appeal arises from a summary judgment which dismissed an action, based on the theory of attractive nuisance, against house movers.

In May, 1965, Craig Browning, then six years old, was seriously injured while on the way home from school. This injury occurred while young Craig and a companion were exploring the interior of an unattended garage which had been placed on a trailer by the appellees-house movers. The precise cause of the injury was a collapse of a stack of heavy wood billets, one of which fell on the child.

It was contended that the house movers knew the garage would attract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heider v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lyshak v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Morris v. Lewis Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Petrak v. Cooke Contracting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Nielsen v. Henry H. Stevens, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. SabinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Murday v. Bales Trucking, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Aetna Insurance v. StringhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Aetna Insurance Company v. Evelyn StringhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API