Celluloid Co. v. Arlington Mfg. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
This was a suit in equity by the Celluloid Company against the Arlington Manufacturing Company for alleged infringement of certain patents.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHES ON, Circuit Judge.
The bill charges the defendant with infringement of two letters patent, of which the complainant is assignee, namely, letters patent No. 546,360, dated September 17, 1895, granted to John H. Stevens and Edwin D. Harrison, assignors to the complainant, for the “production of imitation onyx from pyroxylin compounds,” and letters patent No. 542,452, dated July 9, 1895, granted to Charles H Thurber and Christian W. Schaefer, assignors to the complainant, for an “improvement in celluloid articles, and in the process of manufacturing the same.” The defense most relied on is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lehnbeuter v. HolthausSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
- International Curtis Marine Turbine Co. v. William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Municipal Signal Co. v. National Electrical Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1899