Legal Opinion

In Re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided March 20, 2007No. MDL-1816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

MILLER, Acting Chairman.

This litigation presently consists of the 25 actions listed on Schedule A and pending in two districts as follows: twenty actions in the Eastern District of Texas and five actions in the District of Delaware. The patents involved in these actions relate to the integration of telephone systems with computer databases and/or live operator call centers to provide “interactive call processing” or “interactive voice response.” Now before the Panel are two motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, seeking centralization of all or a subset of these 25 actions. 1

In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Acacia Media Technologies Corp. Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rumble Canada, Inc. v. Google LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API