Legal Opinion
Otten v. Cavalli
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
Decided April 24, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHartshorne, J.
The question arises, on motion to quash
an execution levy, as to whether insurance policy proceeds payable in annual installments are subject to garnishment proceedings, particularly when such annual installments, if paid weekly, would amount to less than $18 per week.
While a question is raised as to the right of the garnisheed insurance company to move to quash, this will be passed over, in view of the representation to the court that if same were considered material, exactly the same action would be taken by the defendant himself, who, in fact, does raise the meritorious questions.
As stated…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Dimick v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Fleming v. Fleming Hotel Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Passaic National Bank, C., Co. v. EelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Seventy-First Street & Broadway Corp. v. ThorneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cameron v. EwingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012