Legal Opinion
State of NM ex rel Peterson v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 2014No. Docket 32,128PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Qui Tam Plaintiff David Peterson (Plaintiff), on behalf of the State, sued Aramark Correctional Services, LLC (Aramark) in May 2010, claiming that Aramark violated the Fraud Against Taxpayers Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 44-9-1 to -14 (2007). See § 44-9-5(A) (stating that a person bringing an action under the Act, on behalf of the State, shall be referred to as the qui tam plaintiff). The lawsuit was based on allegations that Aramark, who was under contract to provide meals for inmates in the Western New Mexico Correctional Facility (the Facility) of the New Mexico…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States ex rel. Eisenstein v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States Ex Rel. Lusby v. Rolls-Royce Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Deflon v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. Laird v. Lockheed Martin Engineering & Science Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Peterson v. Aramark Corr. Servs., LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Balderas v. Bristol-Myers SquibbNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Armijo v. City of EspanolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016