Legal Opinion

Puz v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 13, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

On February 24, 1981, Richard McDonald and Michael Howard, armed and wearing bullet-proof vests, attempted to rob a pharmacy owned by appellees. Their attempt was aborted when McDonald turned away from Mrs. Puz, who was then able to grab her own gun and shoot him in the back. McDonald and Howard were apprehended by police as they attempted to flee, and were subsequently indicted on several counts of armed robbery, armed kidnapping and conspiracy to commit armed robbery. Pursuant to plea agreements, McDonald was sentenced to 7.5 years’ imprisonment, and Howard was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nienstedt v. WetzelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Acheson v. ShafterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Valley National Bank v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Dodge City Motors, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Deno v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Flockhart v. WyantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Olmstead v. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Elliott v. VideanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API